EDITION 1.0
AI can help with quality decisions. It can't make them.
Tools and guidance for using AI in wind-industry quality and APQP, with a named human accountable for every decision.
THE LINE
AI does the work. A person judges, approves and signs.
Click a verb above to see the boundary.
THE PURPOSE
From fragmented evidence to a better quality decision.
Wind-quality teams already hold requirements, risk analyses, control plans, inspection records, supplier submissions and field lessons. The hard part is making that evidence connected, reviewable and useful before the next decision.
This publication helps you choose a use case, define its human boundary, build the evidence, validate performance, and retain a record of the release decision. It does not automate product release, acceptance, disposition or residual-risk approval.
OPERATE
18 instruments across the control lifecycle
Verification Ratio
Is checking the answer cheaper than producing it?
Open instrument →02 · LIVEVerification Matrix & Portfolio Map
Where does each use case sit, and is the portfolio a trap?
Open instrument →03 · LIVEThirty-Second Lab
Can a competent reviewer verify a finding in half a minute?
Open instrument →04 · LIVERisk Classifier
What level of control does this use case require?
Open instrument →05 · LIVEData & Evidence Readiness
Is the evidence foundation ready for a controlled AI use case?
Open instrument →06 · LIVEAttribute Agreement Study
Do reviewers and the system agree on the same cases?
Open instrument →07 · LIVECorrelated Error Simulator
How often can a clean sample hide a failing class?
Open instrument →08 · LIVESeeded-Case Protocol
Does the tool fail safely on known difficult cases?
Open instrument →09 · LIVEGolden Set Builder
What known-correct cases will prove the intended use?
Open instrument →10 · LIVEQualification File & Release
Is there enough evidence to restrict, pilot, release, or stop?
Open instrument →11 · LIVEQuality Evidence Graph
What connects this decision to its evidence, controls, and lessons learned?
Open instrument →12 · LIVEAPQP Lifecycle Explorer
Where should this capability operate in the product lifecycle?
Open instrument →13 · LIVEConfiguration Attestation & Gate Pack
What exact configuration was reviewed and accepted?
Open instrument →14 · LIVESurvivability Test
Will the control survive real operational change?
Open instrument →15 · LIVEMaturity Ladder
What capability exists today, and what should be built next?
Open instrument →16 · LIVERoadmap Generator
What is the next evidence-backed action?
Open instrument →17 · LIVEProhibited List & Signature Test
What decisions must remain human and signed?
Open instrument →18 · LIVEAcademy
How do teams build and demonstrate competence?
Open instrument →READ